Cases filed in Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,337
Prime Minister of Russia Vladimir Putin v. Deco 969 et al
as 4:2024cv00388
Plaintiff: Prime Minister of Russia Vladimir Putin and Lakeshia Edmond
Defendant: Deco 969, Truist Bank, Haltom Jewelry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Telsync Technologies LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00227
Plaintiff: Telsync Technologies LLC
Defendant: T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Telsync Technologies LLC v. AT&T, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00295
Plaintiff: Telsync Technologies LLC
Defendant: AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sykes v. Watt et al
as 4:2024cv00378
Plaintiff: James Elwyn Sykes
Defendant: Sheriff Tom Watt, FNU Starky, T. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Consensys Software Inc. v. Gensler et al
as 4:2024cv00369
Plaintiff: Consensys Software Inc.
Defendant: Gary Gensler, Caroline A. Crenshaw, Jaime E. Lizarraga and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. AT&T, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00282
Plaintiff: WirelessWerx IP, LLC
Defendant: AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Lira et al v. T. Clement Logistics, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00443
Plaintiff: JULISSA SARAHI LIRA and NORMA VICENTA MORAN
Defendant: T. CLEMENT LOGISTICS, LLC and HEZEKIAH OMAR ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Sanford v. AT&T
as 2:2024cv00261
Plaintiff: Mary Loechel Sanford
Defendant: AT&T
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Garner et al v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00962
Plaintiff: COURTNEY GARNER, JERYL LUCIANI and Michael CRAIN,
Defendant: AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01435
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?