Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Perry v. Jones et al
as 3:2016cv01015
Plaintiff:
Raymond Perry
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Kevin D. Jordan, J. H. Yonn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. LAWSON et al
as 4:2016cv00263
Plaintiff:
GERRARD D JONES
Defendant:
C L HODGSON, JEFFREY T BEASLEY, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Vashey v. Officer Chestnut, et al
as 16-10702
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD R. VASHEY
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER CHESTNUT, OFFICER LAVASER, B-SHIFT SERGENT E-DORM CONFINEMENT and others
Jones v. Johnson et al
as 3:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
Gerrard D. Jones
Defendant:
Torrey M. Johnson, Antonio M. Hudson, C L. Hodgson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vashey v. Chestnut et al
as 6:2015cv02055
Plaintiff:
Edward R. Vashey
Defendant:
Officer Chestnut, Officer Lavaser, B-Shift Sergent E-Dorm Confinement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beasley v. Colvin
as 7:2015cv00246
Plaintiff:
Alan T. Beasley
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Marshall et al v. Scott et al
as 8:2015cv02535
Plaintiff:
Douglas Marshall and Jammora Ishmael
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Julie L. Jones, Jeffrey T. Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holston v. Limb et al
as 8:2015cv02157
Plaintiff:
Reginald L. Holston
Defendant:
H. Limb, J. Keith, Jefffrey T. Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Timothy Austin v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 15-13075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY AUSTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFERY T. BEASLEY, I.G Chief, ROBERT NELSON and others
Austin v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00586
Plaintiff:
Timothy Austin
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Jeffery T. Beasley, Robert Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
