Cases 1 - 10 of 336
Rose v. Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00419
Petitioner:
William Rose
Respondent:
Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
Material Witne:
KPMG LLP
Intervenor:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Rose v. Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
as 2:2024mc00008
Petitioner:
William Rose
Respondent:
Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
Material Witne:
KPMG LLP
Intervenor:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
BRUCE v. T-MOBILE USA INC.
as 2:2024cv05721
Petitioner:
NELSON L. BRUCE
Respondent:
T-MOBILE USA INC.
Interested Party:
REV FEDERAL CREDIT UNION and TRANS UNION, LLC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sepulveda v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Rudy Sepulveda
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. Anthony Dale, et al
as 24-8013
Petitioner:
T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Respondent:
ANTHONY DALE, BRETT JACKSON, JOHNNA FOX and others
Morvarid Emamy v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Morvarid Emamy
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Panchal et al v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Pina Panchal and South Tampa Cardiology, LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Schanz et al v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Ashley Schanz and Sebastian Schanz
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151 Federal Communications Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
