Cases 31 - 40 of 54
LaKeith McCoy v. M. Garikaparthi, et al
as 19-15776
Defendant / Appellee:
J. KEELER, Cook at CCI, M. GARIKAPARTHI, M.D. at CCI, T. CHAVEZ, Supervisor at CCI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAKEITH L. MCCOY, AKA LaKeith LeRoy McCoy
Chavez v. Sunlite Avenue Tenant, L.L.C.
as 1:2019cv01867
Plaintiff:
Kenneth T. Chavez
Defendant:
Sunlite Avenue Tenant, L.L.C. d/b/a The Local Hostels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chavez v. 39-12 29th Street, Llc, d/b/a Nesva Hotel
as 1:2019cv01454
Plaintiff:
Kenneth T. Chavez
Defendant:
39-12 29th Street, Llc, d/b/a Nesva Hotel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chavez v. Long Island City Partners LLC
as 1:2019cv01069
Plaintiff:
Kenneth T. Chavez
Defendant:
Long Island City Partners LLC and Long Island City Partners LLC doing business as Hotel Vetiver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chavez v. KCN Hospitality LLC
as 1:2019cv01079
Plaintiff:
Kenneth T. Chavez
Defendant:
KCN Hospitality LLC and KCN Hospitality LLC doing business as Voyage Hotel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chavez v. YRC Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv07843
Defendant:
YRC, INC., Joe G. Orochena and YRC Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maria T Chavez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davidson v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2018cv00722
Plaintiff:
Ryan P. Davidson
Defendant:
W.J. Sullivan, T. Chavez, Daniel E. Mehlman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv00483
Plaintiff:
Manuel T. Chavez
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Chavez v. Judd
as 1:2018cv00219
Petitioner:
Peter T. Chavez
Respondent:
Betty Judd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chavez v. Judd et al
as 1:2018cv00020
Plaintiff:
Peter T. Chavez
Defendant:
Betty Judd and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
