Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dirk T. Griffin et al v. Mark W. Strauss et al
as 2:2022cv06183
Plaintiff:
Dirk T. Griffin, Pinner Construction Co., Inc., Mechanical Technology Systems, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mark W. Strauss, DACM Project Management, Inc., Arcadis U.S., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act
David Prentice v. Diplomat Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01642
Defendant:
Atul Kavthekar, Brian T. Griffin, Jeffrey Park and others
Plaintiff:
David Prentice
William Riehm v. Diplomat Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01369
Defendant:
Atul Kavthekar, Diplomat Pharmacy, Inc., Brian T. Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
William Riehm
Griffin v. Monterey County Sheriffs Department
as 3:2011cv03536
Plaintiff:
Joshua T. Griffin
Defendant:
Monterey County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Monterey County Sheriffs Department
as 3:2011cv03491
Plaintiff:
Joshua T. Griffin
Defendant:
Monterey County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brady K. Armstrong v. Yates et al
as 1:2010cv02380
Plaintiff:
Brady K. Armstrong
Defendant:
James A. Yates, R.H. Trimble, M.C. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv08845
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Armstrong v. Yates et al
as 1:2008cv00487
Plaintiff:
Brady K. Armstrong
Defendant:
James A. Yates , R.H. Trimble , M C Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dowell v. Griffin et al
as 3:2009cv02576
Plaintiff:
Donald Dowell
Defendant:
W T Griffin, M Botkin, M Zdunich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Yates et al
as 2:2008cv00533
Plaintiff:
Brady K. Armstrong
Defendant:
James A. Yates, R.H. Trimble, M C Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
