Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Holmes v. USA
as 1:2016cv00455
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Marlon T. Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
TALBERT v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2014cv06094
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
MICHELE FARRELL, DEJESUS, K. PAONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Marlon Holmes
as 13-4829
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARLON T. HOLMES
Holmes v. Keen et al
as 3:2013cv01935
Petitioner:
Marlon T. Holmes
Respondent:
Daniel S. Keen and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. Keen et al
as 3:2013cv01635
Plaintiff:
Marlon T. Holmes
Defendant:
Daniel S. Keen, Mike Morrow and Brian Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Asbestos Product
as 13-2000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CATHRYN HOLME, Special Administrator for the Estate of Darrell T. Holme Sr
Defendant - Appellee:
AC & S INC, CHICAGO FIRE BRICK, CSR LTD and others
Holmes v. Keen et al
as 1:2013cv00964
Plaintiff:
Marlon T. Holmes
Defendant:
Daniel S. Keen, Mike Morrow, Brian Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00651
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HOLMES v. GAF CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv80059
Plaintiff:
NORMAN T. HOLMES
Defendant:
GAF CORPORATION, THE FLINTKOTE COMPANY, ROCKWOOL MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORRIS et al v. SHABANIE AND MASHABA et al
as 2:2007cv61264
Plaintiff:
BELINDA H, MORRIS, BELINDA H, MORRIS, LOUIS T HOLMES and others
Defendant:
SHABANIE AND MASHABA, TURNER & NEWALL, GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
