Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Okorie v. University Mall, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Ikechukwu Hyginius Okorie
Defendant:
University Mall, LLC, Joseph R. Tullos, James Poncho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jackson v. Unknown Warden
as 3:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
LaKeevis T Jackson
Defendant:
Unknown Warden
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Harrison
as 3:2022cv00471
Plaintiff:
Jermaine T. Jackson
Defendant:
Warden C. Harrison
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jackson v. Newton County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2021cv00495
Plaintiff:
La'Keevis T. Jackson
Defendant:
Newton County Sheriff's Office and Sheriff Jody Pennington
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00342
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00022
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Williams v. Management and Training Corp. et al
as 5:2019cv00087
Defendant:
Warden F. Shaw, Deputy Warden T. Jackson, Case Manager T. Arbuthnot and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Charles Williams
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Management Training Corporation et al
as 5:2014cv00085
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Hill
Defendant:
Management Training Corporation, Frank Shaw, Unknown Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Lee et al
as 4:2014cv00095
Plaintiff:
Ollie Lee Evans
Defendant:
Earnest Lee, Vertena Flagg, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Shaw et al
as 5:2014cv00006
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Mitchell
Defendant:
Unknown Shaw, T. Jackson, Gabriel Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
