Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Peacock v. Malloy et al
as 3:2018cv00406
Plaintiff:
Randall Peacock
Defendant:
Dannel Malloy, Nancy Wyman, George Jepsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robles v. United States Attorney et al
as 3:2018cv00370
Plaintiff:
Rolando Robles
Defendant:
United States Attorney , Attorney General of the United States , Ndidi N. Moses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akande v. Jepsen et al
as 3:2016cv02137
Plaintiff:
Jason Shola Akande
Defendant:
George Jepsen and Kevin T. Kane
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Akande v. Jepsen et al
as 3:2017cv00001
Plaintiff:
Jason Shola Akande
Defendant:
George Jepsen and Kevin T. Kane
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Brown v. Gerety et al
as 3:2016cv00411
Defendant:
Miles Gerety, Dennis P. Mcdonough, Joseph Bruckman and others
Plaintiff:
Kenya Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Kane et al
as 3:2014cv01961
Plaintiff:
Elbert L. Morgan
Defendant:
Kevin T. Kane, Michael L. Regan, Mary Jean Kanabis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Democratic Governors Association v. Brandi et al
as 3:2014cv00544
Plaintiff:
Democratic Governors Association
Defendant:
Michael J. Brandi , Anthony J. Castagno , Salvatore Bramante and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Republican Party of Connecticut
Amicu:
The Campaign Legal Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shew et al v. Malloy et al
as 3:2013cv00739
Plaintiff:
June Shew , Mitchell Rocklin , Stephanie Cypher and others
Defendant:
Dannel P. Malloy , Kevin T. Kane , Reuben F. Bradford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nowacki v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Nowacki
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Chase Rogers, Peter Zarella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patton v. Melchiorre et al
as 3:2012cv01439
Plaintiff:
Eric Patton
Defendant:
Vicki Melchiorre, Kevin T. Kane, Mildred Weinstein and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
