Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Richard Stein v. D. Gill, et al
as 17-1871
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD DEAN STEIN
Defendant - Appellee:
D. GILL, Corrections Officer, L. MAKI, 034 Hearing Officer, S. RAYMOND, Hearing Investigator and others
Stein #219903 v. Gill et al
as 2:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
Richard Dean Stein #219903
Defendant:
D. Gill, L. Maki, S. Raymond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones #183037 v. Carr et al
as 2:2013cv00134
Plaintiff:
Darrell Jones #183037
Defendant:
Karen Carr, Gloria Hill, William Jondreau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbard #481211 et al v. Morin et al
as 2:2013cv00095
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tarone Hubbard #481211 and Allen D. Daniel #537193
Defendant:
Anne M. Morin, Gloria Hill, Prison Health Care Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White #292523 v. Sweeney et al
as 2:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Walter White #292523
Defendant:
B. Sweeney, T. Meyers, T. Linder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne #217861 v. Heyns et al
as 2:2012cv00312
Plaintiff:
Antonio C. Payne #217861
Defendant:
Daniel Heyns, Michael Curley, S. Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel #537193 et al v. Sweeney et al
as 2:2012cv00280
Defendant:
B. Sweeney, Michael Curley, Shane Place and others
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193 and Walter White #292523
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaPlante v. Ellison et al
as 1:2012cv00240
Plaintiff:
William T. LaPlante
Defendant:
Marcie Ellison, Amos Oneal, Chris Shay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett #415872 v. Hill et al
as 2:2012cv00002
Plaintiff:
Frank Barnett #415872
Defendant:
Gloria Hill, Margaret Comfort and T. LaPlante
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colvin #192744 v. Capello et al
as 2:2010cv00297
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Colvin #192744, Jr.
Defendant:
Gary Capello, Linda Tribley, Timothy Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
