Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Moore v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv06518
Defendant:
Perfecting Faith Church, Carly Bass, Nathan Lee Both Plumbers and others
Plaintiff:
Alicia Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv04915
Defendant:
Darren T. Moore, Nathan Lee, JP Morgan Chase Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Alicia Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
GOSSETT v. BARRY et al
as 1:2023cv01166
Plaintiff:
BRIAN GOSSETT
Defendant:
ROBERT D. BARRY, DOUGLAS T. MOORE, ALBERT FOUERTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Gossett v. Moore et al
as 1:2023cv01168
Plaintiff:
Brian Gossett
Defendant:
Douglas T. Moore, Robert D. Barry, Albert Fouerti and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Wong v. Moore et al
as 1:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Mei Ling Wong
Defendant:
Douglas T. Moore, Robert Barry, Albert Fouerti and others
Maschhoff v. Polished.com Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06606
Plaintiff:
Ryan Maschhoff
Defendant:
Polished.com Inc., Douglas T. Moore, Robert D. Barry and others
Petitioner:
Anthony Porraro, Eden Alpha CI LP and Ari Gold
Davison v. Bunce et al
as 9:2019cv00653
Defendant:
R. Purlier, Rocque (Female), R. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Davison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv03819
Plaintiff:
Arthur F. Anderson, Lorain A. Anderson, Newton L. Ball and others
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 3 and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Moore v. Sposato et al
as 2:2012cv01941
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe and Michael Sposato
Plaintiff:
Linzy T. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kase v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2010cv06476
Plaintiff:
Justin Kase
Defendant:
City of Rochester, City of Rochester Police Department, David T. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
