Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2017cv01520
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2016cv02280
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffery A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alton Brown v. John Wetzel, et al
as 16-3611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JEFFREY BEARD, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC, AKA Corizon and others
Debtor - Appellee:
JON FISHER
Defendant:
MEDICAL DIRECTOR II, LT VEROSKI, D. BRUMFIELD and others
Debtor:
SUSAN WHITE and ARCHIE TRADER
Allen Kelly v. J.T. Merrell, et al
as 16-1368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
J.T. MERRELL, R. REED, RAUCH and others
Debtor - Appellee:
LISA HOLLIBAUGH and RACHEL MILLS
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2015cv01959
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
Robert Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammonds v. PA Dept. of Corr. et al
as 4:2015cv01063
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Hammonds
Defendant:
PA Dept. of Corr., John Wetzel, Shirley Moore Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Merrell et al
as 1:2014cv02322
Plaintiff:
Allen Kelly
Defendant:
J. T. Merrell, R. Reed, Rauch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv05762
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JEFFREY A. BEARD, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Kuhn et al
as 1:2010cv01260
Plaintiff:
George Rivera
Defendant:
D.A. Kuhn, F.R. Royer, R.L. Heaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01322
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
