Cases 1 - 10 of 15
(PC) Litovsky v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Michael Litovsky
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, L. Lundy, T. Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Martin v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, et al.
as 1:2023cv00387
Plaintiff:
Orental Martin
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, L. Lundy, T Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hernandez v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Peter Hernandez
Defendant:
California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, L. Lundy, T. Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Sams v. Lundy et al
as 1:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
James Plas Sams
Defendant:
Leanna Lundy, T. Valdez, Z. Rietman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Calloway v. CDCR, et al.
as 1:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Raymond Calloway
Defendant:
CDCR, L. Lundy, T Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Pulling v. Pollard et al
as 1:2020cv00970
Defendant:
T. Valdez, B. Hedrick, N. Bourdlales and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Pulling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifford R. Anderson et al v. City of Los Angeles
as 2:2016cv00187
Plaintiff:
Clifford R Anderson, Marvin D Anderson, Eugene M Andrews and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles
Valdez v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 1:2014cv01702
Plaintiff:
Thomas T. Valdez
Defendant:
Hickenlooper, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valdez v. People of the State of Californa
as 5:2014cv01206
Respondent:
People of the State of Californa
Petitioner:
Rodney T. Valdez
Valdez v. People of the State of Californa
as 1:2014cv00879
Petitioner:
Rodney T. Valdez
Respondent:
People of the State of Californa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
