Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Poteete et al v. County of Lassen et al
as 2:2026at01719
Plaintiff:
Arthur Daniel Poteete, Brenda Poteete, L.P. and others
Defendant:
County of Lassen, John McGarva and Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Poteete et al v. County of Lassen et al
as 2:2026cv03263
Plaintiff:
Arthur Daniel Poteete, Brenda Poteete, L.P. and others
Defendant:
County of Lassen, John McGarva and Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
T.P.02 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv09592
Plaintiff:
T.P.02
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gardner v. Egan et al
as 1:2026cv10625
Plaintiff:
William Gardner and William Rashid Mustapha Gardner
Defendant:
Russell A. Egan, Joseph E. Pizza, M.K. Elliston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
T.P.01 v. Rasier-CA, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv09063
Plaintiff:
T.P.01
Defendant:
Rasier-CA, LLC, Rasier, LLC and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
T.P. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv08745
Plaintiff:
T.P.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06490
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jane Doe PNA (T.P.) v. Uber Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2026cv07457
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe PNA (T.P.)
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc, Rasier CA - LLC and Rasier LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jane Doe NLG (T.P.1) v. Uber Technologies, Inc et al
as 3:2026cv06051
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe NLG (T.P.1)
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc, Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
