Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shadrin et al v. Student Loan Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv03641
Defendant:
Williams & Fudge, Inc., Feldman & Associates, P.C. and Student Loan Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Yury Shadrin and Tania Burinskas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crampton et al v. Department of Health and Human Services - Child Welfare Services et al
as 8:2020cv00498
Defendant:
Jessica Anduray, Lisa Merkin, Marwan Castellani and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Crampton and Crystal Crampton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McQuillen et al v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2019cv03603
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Keith McQuillen and Tania Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCray v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00939
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
Tania McCray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bequette et al v. Fourmile Wind Energy, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00458
Plaintiff:
Tony Bequette , Tania Bequette and Meghan Bequette
Defendant:
Fourmile Wind Energy, LLC and Exelon Wind, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baker et al v. Sunny At Treasures
as 1:2013cv01616
Plaintiff:
Tania Baker and Sandra Bryant
Defendant:
Sunny At Treasures
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Baker v. T-Mobile
as 1:2012cv03283
Plaintiff:
Tania Baker
Defendant:
T-Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
