Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shi et al v. Ajisai Japanese Fusion, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv09340
Plaintiff:
Jian Shi, Xin Yu Li, Hong Tao Chen and others
Defendant:
Ajisai Japanese Fusion, Inc., Hane Japanese Fusion, Inc., Yao Yao Sushi, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04245
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Li et al v. Chen et al
as 2:2018cv00571
Defendant:
Shuping Lin, Tao's Fusion, Sweet Mandarin Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Yan Ming Wang, Rui Wang, Feng Ying Zhao and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Li et al v. Chen et al
as 1:2018cv00571
Defendant:
Shuping Lin, Tao's Fusion, Sweet Mandarin Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Yan Ming Wang, Rui Wang, Feng Ying Zhao and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jinquan et al v. Pomodoro Italian Express Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv10244
Plaintiff:
Jinquan Yin and Letian Zhu
Defendant:
Pomodoro Italian Express Inc., Zhen Huang Zheng, 518 Pomodoro, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Tao Chen v. U.S. Attorney General
as 17-11529
Petitioner:
TAO CHEN
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chan et al v. A Taste of Mao, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09723
Plaintiff:
Wai Hung Chan , Han Tao Chen , Wai Yip Chan and others
Defendant:
A Taste of Mao, Inc. , Zhen Qi Xiao , Wen Ding Li and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
