Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Execware LLC v Target Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv00244
Plaintiff:
Execware LLC
Defendant:
Target Corp., Target Brands Inc. and Target.Com
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
2253 Apparel, Inc. v. Target Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv09243
Plaintiff:
2253 Apparel, Inc.
Defendant:
Target Brands, Inc., Target Corporate Services, Inc. and Target Corporation
2253 Apparel Inc v. Target Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv09273
Plaintiff:
2253 Apparel Inc
Defendant:
Does, Target Brands Inc, Target Corporate Services Inc and others
Preservation Technologies LLC v. Target Brands Inc.
as 1:2013cv01692
Plaintiff:
Preservation Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Target Brands Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Michael Miller Fabrics, LLC v. Dorel Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv06527
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller Fabrics, LLC
Defendant:
Dorel Industries, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Hayneedle, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Spirit Hoods LLC v. Target Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv00315
Defendant:
Does, Target Brands Inc and Target Corporation
Plaintiff:
Spirit Hoods LLC
VIRTUAL REALITY FEEDBACK CORPORATION et al v. TARGET BRANDS, INC. et al
as 3:2012cv06410
Plaintiff:
VIRTUAL REALITY FEEDBACK CORPORATION and CRAIG THORNER
Defendant:
TARGET BRANDS, INC. and TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Droplets, Inc. v. Target Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00391
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Target Brands, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
David Keyzer
Plaintiff:
Droplets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Second Generation Inc v. Topson Downs of California Inc et al
as 2:2012cv03603
Defendant:
Does, Target Brands Inc, Target Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Second Generation Inc
Execware LLC v. Target Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00383
Plaintiff:
Execware LLC
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Target Brands Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
