Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00042
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sinapi v. Rhode Island Board of Examiners et al
as 1:2015cv00311
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Sinapi
Defendant:
Rhode Island Board of Bar Examiners , David A. Wollin, Esq. , Mellissa K. Burnett-Testa, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirshenbaum v. GE Money Bank et al
as 1:2014cv00294
Plaintiff:
Sally Kirshenbaum
Defendant:
GE Money Bank, National Enterprise Systems , Tate & Kirlin Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Seguin v. Textron, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00012
Defendant:
Patricia A. Murray-Raposa, Paul Suttell, Gero Meyersiek and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Hugh T. Clements, Jr., Peter F. Kilmartin, John E McCann, III and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Seguin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Tate v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03235
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Tate
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Tate v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02721
Plaintiff:
Ellen J. Tate and Ellen J. Tate
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Marcello et al v. Constable Alfred Harris et al
as 1:2007cv00055
Plaintiff:
James C. Marcello and Olivia A. Marcello
Defendant:
Constable Alfred Harris, John Lacross, Judge Patricia Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
