Cases 1 - 10 of 98
HARO v. STARK
as 1:2024cv01294
Plaintiff:
ABIGAIL HARO
Defendant:
ALAN M. STARK
Cross Defendant:
KEVIN B. PIERCY, TAYLOR R. EALAND, JAMES D. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WINSTON et al v. MONAHAN et al
as 1:2023cv02123
Plaintiff:
YASMEEN WINSTON and INDIA JOHNSON
Defendant:
GREGORY T. MONAHAN, JESSICA TAYLOR, JAMES M. MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HAZEL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv01183
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR HAZEL
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
QUANDER V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv02539
Not Classified By Court:
Mr. douglas Brian quander, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Director TOM FAUST and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLASS B. QUANDER
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, TOM FAUST, TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. UNION-STATES OF THE UNITED STATES OF NORTH AMERICA
as 1:2022cv00744
Plaintiff:
ERIC EMANUEL TAYLOR
Defendant:
UNION-STATES OF THE UNITED STATES OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
