Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Jones v. Warden Strong et al
as 4:2023cv04471
Plaintiff:
Sean D Jones
Defendant:
Warden Strong, Suzzane V. Temorio, Victoria C. Dorimics and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teale et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2023cv04189
Plaintiff:
Thomas Teale and Linda Teale
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2616 Medical Recovery Act
Jackson v. Teal House Coffee & Bakery, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01382
Plaintiff:
Miranda Jackson
Defendant:
Teal House Coffee & Bakery, LLC and Gerald L. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01027
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Burkhart v. University Interscholastic League (UIL) et al
as 1:2022cv01026
Plaintiff:
Jerry burkhart
Defendant:
University Interscholastic League (UIL), Michael motheral, Arturo Rodriguez Cavazos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Constitutional Rights
Teal v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv01945
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Leonard T Teal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Searcy v. Paxton et al
as 3:2021cv00113
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Defendant:
Ralph Willis, Joseph McDevett, Amber Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Darring et al
as 3:2021cv00117
Defendant:
Jaime Rawlinson, Tammy Cisernos, Galveston County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. State Bar of Texas Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel et al
as 3:2021cv00114
Defendant:
Warren Paxton, Tammy Cisernos, Ralph Willis and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
