Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Laughing Rabbit Inc v. Laser Bonding Tech Inc
as 2:2020cv01513
Defendant:
Laser Bonding Tech Inc
Plaintiff:
Laughing Rabbit Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Quesenberry v. AAA Kartak, Co, et al
as 2:2020cv01219
Defendant:
Realogics Brokerage, LLC, Experience US LLC, Pacific Coast Renovations, LLC. and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Quesenberry
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Kittitas Reclamation District v. Tetra Tech Inc
as 1:2019cv03252
Plaintiff:
Kittitas Reclamation District
Defendant:
Tetra Tech Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Vancouver v. Sackler et al
as 3:2019cv05930
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., John and Jane Does 1 through 100, Beverly Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
City of Vancouver
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Comstock v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv05119
Defendant:
SpecGx, LLC, KVK-Tech, Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
william J comstock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tile Tech Inc v Appian Way Sales Inc et al
as 2:2017cv01660
Plaintiff:
Tile Tech Inc
Defendant:
Appian Way Sales Inc and Puget Lite-Pavers Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv05872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Diagnos-Techs, Inc. v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 2:2015cv01792
Plaintiff:
Diagnos-Techs, Inc.
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America et al v. Diagnos-Techs Inc et al
as 2:2015cv01724
Plaintiff:
United States of America , Heeyon (Chloe) Cho and David Toan Mai
Defendant:
Diagnos-Techs Inc and Maroun N El Khoury
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Pacific Bioscience Laboratories, Inc. v. Beauty Tech, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00686
Plaintiff:
Pacific Bioscience Laboratories Inc
Defendant:
Beauty Tech, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
