Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Patrick Roether, et al v. State of Georgia, et al
as 22-13731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK ROETHER and HOLLIE ROETHER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF TENNESSEE, COUNTY OF MCINTOSH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. State of Florida et al
as 8:2022cv02454
Plaintiff:
Patti Smith and Patti Elizabeth Smith
Defendant:
State of Florida, State of Tennessee, K. R. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caudle v. Overton County TN et al
as 5:2022cv01221
Plaintiff:
Allen Caudle
Defendant:
Overton County TN, State of Tennessee, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Caudle v. State of Tennessee et al
as 5:2022cv01218
Plaintiff:
Allen Caudle
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, State of New York, State of Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peavy et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Neki Peavy and Billy Eugene Kindell
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Vance Laughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Patrick Roether v. State of Georgia, et al
as 22-10036
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK ROETHER and HOLLIE ROETHER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF TENNESSEE, COUNTY OF MCINTOSH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
