Cases 31 - 40 of 8,772
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 24-40102
Petitioner:
Mark Tyrone Johnson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
James v. Lumpkin
as 24-10141
Petitioner:
Anthony Donnell James
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 24-10305
Petitioner:
Brian Charles Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
El-Bey v. Lumpkin
as 24-10303
Petitioner:
Gary Dion Allen El-Bey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Hoffman v. Lumpkin
as 24-40220
Plaintiff:
Fred Hoffman, III
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Brown v. Lumpkin
as 24-40210
Petitioner:
Bakari Abdul Brown
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Smith v. FCI Texarkana Warden
as 24-40142
Petitioner:
Curtis Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and FCI Texarkana Warden
Ponce v. Lumpkin
as 24-20134
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Ponce
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Belmont v. Lumpkin
as 24-50102
Petitioner:
Jose Carlos Belmont
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Bonner v. Collier
as 24-50229
Plaintiff:
Charles Bonner
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, in his individual and official capacity as Executive Director of Texas Parole Board, Texas Parole Board and Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
