Cases 11 - 20 of 9,215
Butler v. Lumpkin
as 24-10412
Petitioner:
Marcus Quin Butler
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Tran v. Lumpkin
as 24-50352
Petitioner:
Billy Minh Tran
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Hawthorne v. Lumpkin
as 24-10401
Petitioner:
Patrick Hawthorne
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Pearson v. Lumpkin
as 24-20112
Petitioner:
Donnie Ray Pearson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Grimes v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier, Executive Director
as 6:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
John A Grimes
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier, Executive Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. Lumpkin
as 24-20193
Petitioner:
Humberto Andres Maldonado
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Leal v. Lumpkin
as 24-10391
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Leal
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
McCoy v. Lumpkin
as 24-40185
Petitioner:
James McCoy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Joiner v. Lumpkin
as 24-50339
Petitioner:
Joseph V. Joiner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Lacy v. Villalobos et al
as 4:2024cv00896
Plaintiff:
Antonio Maurice Lacy
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Dana Sullivan, Nurse Practitioner Crystal Mable, UTMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
