Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Air Evac EMS, Incorporated v. Kent Sullivan, et al
as 18-50722
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AIR EVAC EMS, INCORPORATED
Intervenor - Appellant:
TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Air Evac EMS, Incorporated v. State of Texas, Dept. of Ins., et al
as 16-51023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AIR EVAC EMS, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, DAVID MATTAX, Texas Commissioner of Insurance, in his official capacity, RYAN BRANNAN, Texas Commissioner of Workers' Compensation, in his official capacity and others
Texas Mutual Insurance Company et al v. PHI Air Medical, LLC
as 1:2016cv00387
Plaintiff:
Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co., TASB Risk Mgmt. Fund, Texas Mutual Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
PHI Air Medical, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FILING ERROR
as 1:2016cv00386
Plaintiff:
Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, TASB Risk Management Fund, Texas Mutual Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
PHI Air Medical, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
MMKK, Inc., et al v. DOWCP, et al
as 16-60051
Petitioner:
MMKK, INCORPORATED, doing business as Walton Barge Terminal and AMERICAN LONGSHORE MUTUAL ASSOCIATION LIMITED
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and FELIX AGUILAR
Texas Mutual Insurance Company v. Commerce and Industry Insurance Company
as 6:2009cv00030
Plaintiff:
Texas Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Commerce and Industry Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Texas Mutual Insurance Company v. United States of America
as 5:2008cv00101
Plaintiff:
Texas Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
