Cases
Johnson v. Balkman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00633
Defendant: Tom Majors, Esq Timothy J Downing, Shon T Erwin and others
Plaintiff: R Wayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Defreeze v. Austin et al
as 5:2020cv00396
Plaintiff: Anthony L Defreeze
Defendant: Jennifer Austin, Thad Balkman and Lori Walkley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ransom v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 1:2018cv00117
Plaintiff: Joseph Ransom
Defendant: State of Oklahoma, Cleveland County and Thad Balkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bassham v. Lawler et al
as 5:2015cv00405
Plaintiff: Kenneth Bassham
Defendant: Travis Lawler, Lamun Mock Cunnyngham & Davis, Thad Balkman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bishop, et al v. Smith, et al
as 14-5006
Plaintiff - Appellant: GAY E. PHILLIPS and SUSAN G. BARTON
Plaintiff: MARY BISHOP and SHARON BALDWIN
Defendant - Appellee: SALLY HOWE SMITH, in her official capacity as Court Clerk for Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. Eric H. Holder, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States of America
Defendant-Intervenor: BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, THAD BALKMAN and OKLAHOMAN'S FOR PROTECTION OF MARRIAGE
Bishop, et al v. Smith, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-5003
Plaintiff - Appellee: SHARON BALDWIN, MARY BISHOP, GAY E. PHILLIPS, individuals and others
Defendant - Appellant: SALLY HOWE SMITH, in her official capacity as Court Clerk for Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. Eric H. Holder, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States of America
Defendant-Intervenor: BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, THAD BALKMAN and OKLAHOMAN'S FOR PROTECTION OF MARRIAGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?