Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Doe v. Citadel, The et al
as 2:2021cv04198
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Citadel, The, Glenn M Walters, Valerie Mercado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00640
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Williams v. Citadel, The et al
as 2:2020cv01282
Plaintiff:
Gavin Williams
Defendant:
Lieutenant General John Rosa, Captain Eugene Paluso, II, Lieutenant Colonel Robert Sberna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jackson v. Citadel, The et al
as 2:2020cv00758
Defendant:
Citadel, The, Eugene F Paluso, The Military College of the State of South Carolina and others
Plaintiff:
Waylon Bruce Jackson, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02357
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas et al v. Citadel Mall et al
as 2:2019cv01591
Plaintiff:
Sheila Thomas, Lamark J Thomas and Amouri Bridal Boutique LLC
Defendant:
Citadel Mall, Trademark Properties Real Estate Services, Jessica Theberge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Imhoff v. Citadel, The et al
as 2:2016cv02870
Plaintiff:
Robert Hudson Imhoff, IV
Defendant:
Citadel, The , John Rosa , Robert Sberna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe 201 v. Rosa et al
as 2:2015cv04119
Plaintiff:
John Doe 201
Defendant:
John W Rosa, Mark Brandenburg, Joseph Trez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe 201 et al v. Citadel, The et al
as 2:2014cv00775
Plaintiff:
Father John Doe 201 and Mother Jane Doe 201
Defendant:
Citadel, The , John Rosa and Mark Brandenburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2013cv03446
Plaintiff:
James Doe
Defendant:
Michael Arpaio, Citadel, The , John G Lackey, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
