Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Barry Cottman v. Jody Farabella, et al
as 22-1724
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BARRY COTTMAN
Defendant / Appellant:
JODY FARABELLA, MILLVILLE CHIEF OF POLICE
Defendant:
P.O. JOSEPH DIXON, 172, P.O. ROBERT RUNKLE, 160 and CITY OF MILLVILLE, NEW JERSEY
Tanika Joyce v. Joseph Dixon, et al
as 22-1262
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TANIKA JOYCE
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH DIXON and CITY OF MILLVILLE
Defendant / Appellant:
CHIEF JODY FARABELLA
ROTIMI v. FARABELLA et al
as 1:2020cv15444
Defendant:
CHIEF JODY FARABELLA, CITY OF MILLVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF MILLVILLE and others
Plaintiff:
AZUOWOH ROTIMI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOYCE v. DIXON et al
as 1:2020cv01117
Defendant:
JOSEPH DIXON, CHIEF JODY FARABELLA and CITY OF MILLVILLE
Plaintiff:
TANIKA JOYCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JOYCE v. DIXON et al
as 1:2020cv01118
Defendant:
JOSEPH DIXON, CHIEF JODY FARABELLA, JOHN DOES I-IV and others
Plaintiff:
TANIKA JOYCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOYCE v. DIXON et al
as 1:2020cv01114
Defendant:
JOSEPH DIXON, SERGEANT JODY FARABELLA and CITY OF MILLVILLE
Plaintiff:
TANIKA JOYCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
THE ESTATE OF EDWARD C. GANDY, JR. et al v. CITY OF MILLVILLE et al
as 1:2020cv00641
Defendant:
JOHN DOE ENTITY, JOHN AND JANE DOE POLICE, MILLVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD C GANDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COTTMAN v. FARABELLA et al
as 1:2019cv14122
Plaintiff:
BARRY COTTMAN
Defendant:
P.O. JOSEPH DIXON, JODY FARABELLA, CITY OF MILLVILLE, NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAPPS et al v. DIXON et al
as 1:2019cv12002
Plaintiff:
AUDRA CAPPS and DOUGLAS GIBSON
Defendant:
JOSEPH DIXON, JOHN DOES, JODY FARABELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAPPS et al v. DIXON et al
as 1:2019cv11999
Plaintiff:
AUDRA CAPPS and DOUGLAS GIBSON
Defendant:
JOSEPH DIXON, JODY FARABELLA, BRYAN ORNDORF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
