Cases 1 - 8 of 8
JOHNSON v. VON ROSENTIEL et al
as 2:2023cv04179
Plaintiff:
TARANI-ALIKE JOHNSON and TARANI A JOHNSON
Defendant:
MARTHA VON ROSENTIEL, MARTHA E VON ROSENTIEL, SHELLEY ROBIN-NEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NGUYEN v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2016cv00829
Plaintiff:
SUSAN NGUYEN
Defendant:
R. SETH WILLIAMS, THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NELSON v. MCGUINNESS et al
as 2:2012cv05884
Plaintiff:
HANEEF NELSON
Defendant:
JAIME L. MCGUINNESS , THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PENNA , JEWEL WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JAMALADDIN v. DIETTERICK et al
as 2:2012cv04686
Plaintiff:
OMAR JAMALADDIN
Defendant:
SCOTT DIETTERICK, THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PENNA, MARTHA VON ROSENSTIEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ABDULLAH v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
as 2:2012cv02495
Plaintiff:
WALIYYUDDIN S. ABDULLAH
Defendant:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DETWILER v. DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT et al
as 3:2010cv00055
Plaintiff:
TODD DETWILER
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT, JAMES HOCK, PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
ADAMS v. LYNN et al
as 2:2009cv05908
Plaintiff:
OLIVIA A. ADAMS
Defendant:
JAMES MURRAY LYNN, THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STRETTON et al v. JONES et al
as 2:2008cv01711
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL C. STRETTON, MINGO STROEBER, LEANNE LITWIN and others
Defendant:
C. DARNELL JONES, II, THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, D. WEBSTER KEOGH and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
