Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Peden v. DNC, et al
as 21-1334
Defendant / Appellee:
NORAH O'DONNELL, Anchor and Managing Editor, CBS Evening News, COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM, CBS, DAVID MUIR, Anchor, Managing Ed., ABC WorldNews Tonight and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD PEDEN
Peden v. Democratic National Committee et al
as 1:2021cv10360
Defendant:
Seema Nanda, Andrew Lacombe, Paula Kerger and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Peden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DYER v. HARRIS et al
as 2:2021cv00002
Defendant:
MICHAEL R PENCE, KAMALA DEVI HARRIS, JOHN DOES and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT R DYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peden v. Democratic National Committee, et al
as 20-2156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD PEDEN
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANY, CHARLES DAVID TODD, Political Director NBC News, SUMNER REDSTONE, Chairman and CEO of National Amusements, Inc. and others
Peden v. Democratic National Committee et al
as 1:2020cv11019
Defendant:
Paula Kerger, Cesar Conde, Jennifer Suozzo and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Peden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peterson v. Burke, et al
as 20-1171
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID LOPEZ, PHOENIX NEWSPAPERS, INC., d/b/a Arizona Republic, LUIS BORBON HOLGUIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY PETERSON
Peterson v. Burke et al
as 1:2018cv12572
Defendant:
The Democratic National Committee, Suzanne Barr, Mario E. Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Peterson and Pro Se Party Jeffrey Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Clinton et al
as 1:2016fp00103
Defendant:
Hillary Clinton, Democratic National Committee, NY Times and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Perales v. Federal Election Commission, et al
as 10-8040
Petitioner:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Respondent:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
