Cases 11 - 20 of 23
L. Cohen v. Barack Obama
as 09-5012
Appellant - Appellant:
L. Charles Cohen
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Obama, also known as Hussein Obama, also known as Barry Obama, also known as Barry Dunham, also known as Barry Soetoro, Condoleezza Rice, U.S. Department of Justice, Hillary Rodham Clinton, U.S. Department of Justice and others
COHEN v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2008cv02150
Plaintiff:
L. CHARLES COHEN
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, JR., CONDOLEEZZA RICE, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Keith R. Judd v. FEC
as 08-5401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Election Commission
JUDD v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
as 1:2008cv01290
Plaintiff:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Defendant:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-40606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Judd v. Federal Communications Commission et al
as 1:2008cv00193
Plaintiff:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant:
Federal Communications Commission and Federal Election Commission
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Judd v. Oboma et al
as 1:2008cv00093
Plaintiff:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant:
Barack Oboma, John McCain, Hillary Rodham Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Judd, Keith Russell v. FEC
as 08-5030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Election Commission
Judd v. Federal Election Commission
as 1:2008cv00004
Plaintiff:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant:
Federal Election Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
JUDD v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
as 1:2007cv02204
Plaintiff:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Defendant:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
