Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ramirez v. United States Federal Government
as 6:2023cv00998
Plaintiff:
Cosme Sanchez Ramirez
Defendant:
United States Federal Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barnes v. Brown et al
as 6:2022cv01349
Plaintiff:
Gerald LeRoy Barnes, II
Defendant:
Kate Brown, State of Oregon /OSH, Shane L. Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv00199
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Edward Taylor and Timothy Darrell Young
Defendant:
Federal Government and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. U.S. Federal Government
as 6:2020cv02124
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Government
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Edward Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01882
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Reitz v. Federal Government, et al
as 3:2014cv00624
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, Federal Government, President of the United States and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Mark Reitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Reitz v. Dept. of Hud et al
as 3:2014cv00625
Defendant:
Dept. of Hud and Federal Government - President
Plaintiff:
Robin Mark Reitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Katz v. Bush et al
as 3:2011cv00050
Defendant:
George Bush, Central Intelligence Agency, Does 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Katz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Katz v. Bush et al
as 2:2011cv00050
Defendant:
George Bush, Central Intelligence Agency, Does 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Katz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Davidson v. Doble et al
as 3:2007cv00932
Plaintiff:
Lennie Ty Davidson
Defendant:
Shaun Doble, Charles Jordan and US Federal Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
