Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Jan Van Dusen v. Catherine Purcell, et al
as 19-15984
Defendant:
MONTIE S. DAY
Defendant / Appellee:
TERESE LAUBSCHER, Probation Deputy of the State Bar of California, DONALD F. MILES, Hearing Judge, Los Angeles, JUDITH A. EPSTEIN, Review Judge, San Francisco and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAN VAN DUSEN
Carlton Reid v. Julius Engel, et al
as 17-15396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLTON L. REID
Defendant - Appellee:
JULIUS M. ENGEL, CALIFORNIA STATE BAR, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Jan Van Dusen v. Catherine Purcell, et al
as 16-16983
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAN VAN DUSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHERINE D. PURCELL, Presiding Judge of the State Bar Court, San Francisco, JUDITH A. EPSTEIN, Review Judge, San Francisco, RICHARD A. HONN, Review Judge, Los Angeles and others
Richard Fine v. State Bar of California, et al
as 14-55650
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD I. FINE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, SCOTT DREXEL, Chief Trial Counsel of the State Bar of California and others
Richard Fine v. State Bar of California, et al
as 12-55706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD I. FINE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, SCOTT DREXEL, Chief Trial Counsel of the State Bar of California and others
Richard Fine v. State Bar of California, et al
as 11-56255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD I. FINE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, SCOTT DREXEL, Chief Trial Counsel of the State Bar of California and others
Ronald Gottschalk v. State Bar of California, et al
as 09-56398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD GOTTSCHALK
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, a public corporation, THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, THE JUDGES OF THE STATE BAR COURT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
