Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 30
In re: Google LLC
as 23-910
Petitioner: Google, LLC
Respondent: The State of Texas, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks v. Amgen Inc.
as 23-28
Plaintiff: State of California ex rel. Don Hanks, State of Delaware ex rel. Don Hanks, District of Columbia ex rel. Don Hanks and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks
Defendant / Appellee: Florida Cancer Specialists, Gulfcoast Oncology Associates, Integrated Community Oncology Network, LLC and others
Defendant: Amgen Inc., Montgomery Cancer Center, Oncology Specialties, P.C. and others
United States of America, ex r v. Amgen Inc.
as 22-18
Plaintiff: United States of America, Ex Rel. Joseph Piacentile and Kevin B. Kilcoyne, State of California, State of Delaware and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Joseph Piacentile and Kevin Kilcoyne
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. Oncology, Inc.
Defendant: Amgen, Inc., Amerisource Bergen Corp., Amerisource Bergen Specialty Group, Inc. and others
The State Of Texas, et al v. Google, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv06841
Plaintiff: The State of Texas, State of Arkansas, State of Idaho and others
Defendant: Google LLC
Intervenor Plaintiff: State of Louisiana and State of South Carolina
Amicus Curiae: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 23 Media Organizations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 at Fed. Question: Anti-trust
In re: Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2021md03010
Plaintiff: Associated Newspapers Ltd., Mail Media, Inc., Emmerich Newspapers, Incorporated and others
Defendant: Google LLC, Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and others
Interpleader: State of Louisiana and State of South Carolina
Interested Party: The Nation Company, L.P., Genius Media Group, Inc., Mikula Web Solutions, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 23 Media Organizations
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Connecticut et al v. Sandoz, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00802
Defendant: Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Mallinckrodt PLC, Pfizer, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: State of New Mexico, State of Missouri, State of Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
State of New York v. United States Department of Education et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv04260
Defendant: United States Department of Education and Elisabeth DeVos
Plaintiff: STATE OF NEW YORK and The Board of Education for the City School District of the City of New York
Amicus Curiae: Association of Public and Land-grant Universities, AASA, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. and others
Intervenor Defendant: Foundation for Individual Rights in Education
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
United States of America ex re v. Abbvie Inc.
as 19-2947
Plaintiff / Appellant: State of North Carolina ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D., State of Texas ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D., State of New York ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D. and others
Defendant: Anthem, Inc., formerly Wellpoint, CVS Caremark, Eli Lilly & Company and others
Defendant / Appellee: Humana Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, CVS Health Corporation and others
Plaintiff: ABC
Connecticut et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. Featured Case
as 3:2019cv00710
Plaintiff: State of North Dakota, State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota and others
Defendant: Actavis Pharma, Inc., Richard Rogerson, Nisha Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
United States of America, ex r v. [SEALED DEFENDANT]
as 19-93
Plaintiff: State of Nevada, State of Florida, State of New Mexico and others
Defendant / Appellee: Trinity Homecare, LLC. and Option Care, Inc.
Defendant: X, Y, and Z and Sealed Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant: Susan Vierczhalek, M.D.
Intervenor: MedImmune Inc. and State of New York

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?