Cases 1 - 10 of 23
People of the State of California v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv05448
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of California, People of the State of California, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Meta Payments, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Conghua Yan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Raj K. Patel v. The University of Notre Dame Du Lac et al
as 2:2023cv06437
Plaintiff:
Raj K. Patel
Defendant:
The University of Notre Dame Du Lac, The United States and The State of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
State of Utah et al v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2021cv05227
Plaintiff:
State of Utah, State of New York, State of North Carolina and others
Defendant:
Google LLC, Google Ireland Limited, Google Commercial Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Frontier Communications Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv04155
Defendant:
Frontier Communications Holdings, LLC, Frontier Communications Corporation, Frontier Communications Intermediate, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, The People of the State of California, State of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant:
Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant:
Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party:
Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner:
Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of California et al v Wheeler
as 3:2020cv03005
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Maryland, City of New York and others
Defendant:
Andrew Wheeler, R. D. James, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Amicus Curiae:
Duarte Nursery, Inc., North American Lake Management Society, Society for Ecological Restoration and others
Intervenor Defendant:
State of Alaska, State of Nebraska, State of Texas and others
Petitioner:
National Cattlemen's Beef Association, American Road and Transportation Builders Association, Edison Electric Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
North American Meat Institute v. Xavier Becerra et al
as 2:2019cv08569
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Karen Ross, Susan Fanelli and others
Plaintiff:
North American Meat Institute
Intervenor Defendant:
Farm Sanctuary, Animal Legal Defense Fund, The Humane Society of the United States and others
Amicus Curiae:
Association of California Egg Farmers and The States of Indiana, Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Utah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
State of Alabama et al v. Endo International PLC, et al
as 3:2019cv04157
Plaintiff:
State of Arkansas, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceutical Inc., Endo international PLC. and Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
United States of America v. State of California et al
as 2:2018cv00490
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
State of California , Edmund Gerald Brown, Jr. and Xavier Becerra
Amicu:
American Center for Law and Justice , State of Texas , State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
State of California et al v. Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2018cv00675
Plaintiff:
State of California , State of Alabama , State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. and Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
