Cases 1 - 7 of 7
K.C. v. THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, et al
as 1:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
K. C., NATHANIEL CLAWSON, BETH CLAWSON and others
Defendant:
THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INDIANA PROFESSIONAL LICENSING AGENCY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, State of Alabama, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Interested Party:
GENDERNEXUS, INC. and GENDER EXPANSIVE KIDS & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams Jr v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv03543
Defendant:
State of Oregon, State of Missouri, State of South Carolina and others
Petitioner:
Andy Hope Williams Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Aimee Hankins v. Dennis Burton, et al
as 17-2077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AIMEE HANKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS BURTON, Probation Officer, Sharp County Arkansas, CRAIG CRONISTER, Probation Officer, State of Missouri, RAYMOND PACE, Sheriff, Ozark County Missouri and others
Defendant:
TIM LOWE, Probation Officer, Mercer County Illinois
El v. Heer et al
as 1:2016cv01056
Plaintiff:
Orlando Preston
Defendant:
David Heer, State of Missouri Eastern District Court and State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lamano v. FBI et al
as 1:2014cv01442
Plaintiff:
Christina Lamano
Defendant:
FBI, Jeremy H Lamano, Sr., Mark E Gilles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of Missouri Office et al
as 1:2012cv05691
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Williams
Defendant:
State of Missouri Office, Erica Cox, State of Missouri Child's Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hankins v. Burton et al
as 4:2011cv04048
Plaintiff:
Aimee Hankins
Defendant:
Dennis Burton, Sharp County Arkansas Probation Office, Gene Forsyth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
