Cases 1 - 10 of 6,926
Juan Argueta-Portillo v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1886
Petitioner:
JUAN ALEXANDER ARGUETA-PORTILLO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv04055
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant:
APPLE, INC. and APPLE INC.
Petitioner:
PHV NICOLE DEMERS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 2 Antitrust Litigation
Esmelin Guzman-Guzman, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1916
Petitioner:
ESMELIN GUZMAN-GUZMAN and S. M.-G.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Francielica Da Silva, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1893
Petitioner:
FRANCIELICA GESSICA DA SILVA, JOAO ROSA PEREIRA-DA SILVA, A. P.-D. S. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Carlos Martinez-Sanchez, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1905
Petitioner:
CARLOS ANDRES MARTINEZ-SANCHEZ, GLORIA VERONICA BERMESO-FERNANDEZ, C. S. M.-B. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ibrahim Ibrahim v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1875
Petitioner:
IBRAHIM NASR IBRAHIM
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nain Vasquez Gonzalez v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1860
Petitioner:
NAIN JOSUE VASQUEZ GONZALEZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mohammad Qatanani v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1849
Petitioner:
MOHAMMAD M. QATANANI
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jose Membreno-Palacios, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1853
Petitioner:
JOSE MATILDE MEMBRENO-PALACIOS and W. A. M.-A.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Maxo Jean v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1846
Petitioner:
MAXO JEAN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
