Cases 11 - 20 of 224
Mahoney v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv10806
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Newton v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv10538
Petitioner:
Faith Newton
Respondent:
United States of America, United States Marshalls and Daniel Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flete-Garcia v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv10612
Plaintiff:
Fulvio Flete-Garcia
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donahue v. United State of America
as 1:2022cv10566
Petitioner:
David Donahue
Respondent:
United State of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fusco v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv40035
Petitioner:
Emilio Fusco
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Newton v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv10333
Petitioner:
Faith Newton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lard Sr. v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv10087
Petitioner:
Ellis Jerome Lard Sr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lard v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv11511
Petitioner:
Ellis J Lard
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Teixeira v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv11333
Petitioner:
Fabrice Teixeira
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Austin v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv10656
Petitioner:
Keith Austin
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
