Cases 1 - 10 of 14,623
Henderson v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv01511
Plaintiff:
Tisha Henderson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00568
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Benson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ashley Benson
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Barraza-Urias v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Samuel Barraza-Urias
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hernandez-Lopez v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Javier Hernandez-Lopez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Discovery Plumbing Solutions, Inc v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv02261
Plaintiff:
Discovery Plumbing Solutions, Inc and Fox Plumbing
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00202
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Thompson v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv02237
Plaintiff:
Sidney Maurice Thompson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballentine v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mohan Ballentine
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hawkins v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00135
Petitioner:
Ellis Earl Hawkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
