Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 598
Placencia v. USA
as 1:2024cv00161
Petitioner: Michael L Placencia
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Drake v. USA
as 1:2024cv00153
Petitioner: Jalen S Drake
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Henry v. USA
as 1:2024cv00143
Petitioner: Adam Henry
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brazier v. USA
as 3:2024cv00247
Petitioner: Kevin L Brazier
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thomas v. USA
as 3:2024cv00238
Petitioner: Cory Thomas
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cowles v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00213
Plaintiff: Kenneth D Cowles, III
Defendant: United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Indiana State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Letner v. USA
as 1:2024cv00108
Petitioner: Joshua R Letner
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Casillas v. USA
as 2:2024cv00085
Petitioner: Roger Casillas
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hartleroad v. USA
as 1:2024cv00100
Petitioner: Kevin Hartleroad
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Walton v. USA
as 2:2024cv00061
Petitioner: Antonio Walton and Buck
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?