Cases 1 - 10 of 11
State Farm Mutual Automible Insurance Company v. United States Post Office
as 1:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automible Insurance Company
Defendant:
United States Post Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
White v. United States Post Office
as 23-1239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES L. WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POST OFFICE
White v. United States Post Office
as 1:2022cv01248
Plaintiff:
James L. White
Defendant:
United States Post Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fyock v. United States Post Office
as 2:2021cv02211
Plaintiff:
Levi Fyock doing business as Scarecrow Farm Lawn Care
Defendant:
United States Post Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Maier (ID 104561) v. Secretary of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv03196
Defendant:
Enforcement, Apprehension and Investigation, Secretary of Corrections, Kansas Parole Board and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Coty Maier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. City of Cortez, Colorado et al
as 1:2018cv03169
Defendant:
Cortez Police Department, City of Cortez, Colorado and United States Post Office at Cortez, Colorado
Plaintiff:
Marion Ornestus Harper, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabaldon v. Albuquerque Family Advocacy et al
as 1:2018cv00373
Plaintiff:
David A. Gabaldon
Defendant:
Albuquerque Family Advocacy, Albuquerque Civilian Police Overshight, New Mexico Lottery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Narayanasamy v. United States Post Office
as 2:2014cv00032
Petitioner:
Lakshmi Narayanasamy
Respondent:
United States Post Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alexander v. United States Post Office
as 1:2012cv00284
Plaintiff:
Chad Alexander
Defendant:
United States Post Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
