Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Tieu v. New York City Economic Development Corporation
as 24-519
Plaintiff:
LIA TIEU
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, WINTHROP HOYT, in his individual and professional capacities and RACHEL LOEB, in her individual and professional capacities
Ly v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv01951
Plaintiff:
Lan Tieu Ly
Defendant:
Attorney General Merrick Garland, Secretary of DHS Alejandro Mayorkas, Director of USCIS Ur Mendoza Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. Binh Tieu
as 24-1310
Defendant:
CUONG MACH BINH TIEU, Steve, Hak Se Wui and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Tieu v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Ha Tieu
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
(HC) Tieu v. USA, et al
as 2:2023cv02858
Petitioner:
Cuong Mach Tieu
Respondent:
United States of America, Department of Homeland Security, Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
USA v. Cuong Binh Tieu
as 22-10178
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CUONG MACH BINH TIEU
TIEU v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09485
Plaintiff:
TRANG KIEU TIEU
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Quang Tieu v. Unknown
as 2:2021cv10054
Plaintiff:
Quang Tieu
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Quach v. Eva Airways Corporation
as 1:2021cv03810
Plaintiff:
NGHI TIEU QUACH
Defendant:
Eva Airways Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
