Cases 1 - 10 of 1,587
O'Neil v. Cermak Health Service et al
as 1:2024cv04957
Plaintiff:
Christopher O'Neil
Defendant:
Cermak Health Service, Thomas Dart, Robert O. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatter v. DART et al
as 1:2024cv04735
Plaintiff:
Daneka Hatter
Defendant:
THOMAS DART, Supt. Cintron, Sgt. Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Milons v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04620
Plaintiff:
Deandree Milons
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Correctional Sergeant Williams and John/Jane Doe #1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trice v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04538
Plaintiff:
Sammy O. Trice
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cermak Medical Service/Staff and Cook County Div. 8 Classifications Supervisor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04199
Plaintiff:
Pierre Lamar Garrett
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Pollock and Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinson v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03741
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Brinson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Rogers v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03739
Plaintiff:
Kavarian Rogers
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Nelson v. Cermak Hospital et al
as 1:2024cv03446
Plaintiff:
Charles Nelson
Defendant:
Cermak Hospital, Cook County Jail and Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huerta v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03452
Plaintiff:
Jose V. Huerta
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roundtree v. Sqeo et al
as 1:2024cv03421
Plaintiff:
Lonnial Roundtree
Defendant:
Sqeo, Stewart, Rosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
