Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Lanzet v. Vical Incorporated et al
as 1:2019cv07528
Defendant:
Richard M. Beleson, Gary A. Lyons, Robert C. Merton and others
Plaintiff:
David M. Lanzet
Jin v. Vical Incorporated et al
as 1:2019cv07451
Defendant:
Vijay B. Samant, Gary A. Lyons, R. Gordon Douglas and others
Plaintiff:
Fuzi Jin
Sabatini v. Vical Incorporated et al
as 1:2019cv01457
Plaintiff:
Eric Sabatini
Defendant:
Vijay B. Samant, Gary A. Lyons, R. Gordon Douglas and others
Calice v. Vical Incorporated et al
as 3:2019cv01437
Defendant:
Vijay B. Samant, R. Gordon Douglas, Vical Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Calice
In Re Merck & Co Inc Securities Derivative & ERISA Litigation
as 4:2012mc00299
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc , Raymond V Gilmartin , Peter S Kim and others
LOCAL NO. 38 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS PENSION FUND v. CLARK et al
as 2:2009cv05668
Plaintiff:
LOCAL NO. 38 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS PENSION FUND
Defendant:
RICHARD T. CLARK, THOMAS H. GLOCER, STEVEN F. GOLDSTONE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
In Re: Merck & Co., Inc., et al
as 08-3158
Plaintiff:
HAWAII LABORERS PENSION PLAN
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HALPERT ENTR INC
Defendant - Appellee:
H. BREWSTER ATWATER, DEREK BIRKIN, LAWRENCE A. BOSSIDY and others
NORMAND v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2008cv03101
Plaintiff:
LOUIS L. NORMAND
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MANAGEMENT PENSION INVESTMENT COMMITTEE, RAYMOND V. GILMARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CIMATO et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2008cv03090
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CIMATO and MICHAEL S. ANDERS
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MANAGEMENT PENSION INVESTMENT COMMITTEE, RAYMOND V. GILMARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ANDERSON v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2008cv02688
Plaintiff:
MAYBELLINE ANDERSON
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., RICHARD T. CLARK, PETER N. KELLOGG and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
