Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Thomas Clay v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-20163
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS H. CLAY
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Clay v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv00028
Petitioner:
Thomas H Clay
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clay v. Zeon M D et al
as 4:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Thomas H Clay
Defendant:
Zae Young Zeon, Bobby Vincent, Betty Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Clay v. Corrtl Manage Health Care/UTMB, et al
as 13-20314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS H CLAY
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MANAGE HEALTH CARE/UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH, GALVESTON & ESTELLE UNIT EMPLOYEES, ET AL, BRIAN HICKS, Medical Coordinator and others
Clay v. Correctional Manage Health Care/UTMB et al
as 4:2013cv00984
Plaintiff:
Thomas H Clay
Defendant:
Correctional Manage Health Care/UTMB, Galveston & Estelle Unit employees et al, Brian Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Clay v. A. Ambriz, et al
as 12-40504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS H CLAY
Defendant - Appellee:
A. AMBRIZ, Major, J MILES, Lieutenant, NORRIS JACKSON, Assistant Warden and others
Clay v. Ambriz
as 2:2012cv00053
Plaintiff:
Thomas H Clay
Defendant:
A. Ambriz, J. Miles, Norris Jackson, Asst. Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clay v. TDCJ Corrtl Inst Div, et al
as 08-20102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS H CLAY
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, DOUG DRETKE, SIMMONS, Captain and others
Clay v. TDCJ Corrtl Inst Div, et al
as 08-20097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS H CLAY
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, DOUG DRETKE, SIMMONS, Captain and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
