Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Clay v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2023cv00615
Plaintiff:
Thomas H Clay
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, CMC/LITMB, TDCJ Parole Release and Process Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Hanson
as 23-40132
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas H. Clay
Defendant / Appellee:
Janis Hanson, NP, Georgia Nehotebah, FNP/CMC, Dr. Rivers and others
Clay v. State Class Dept of TDCJ
as 22-40507
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas H. Clay
Defendant / Appellee:
State Classification Department of TDCJ, Chief of the SCC Transfer Department, Bryan Collier, Executive Director and others
Clay v. Hanson
as 22-40180
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas H. Clay
Defendant / Appellee:
Janis Hanson, NP, Dr. Georgia Nehotebah, FNP/CMC, Dr. Rivers and others
Clay v. State Classification Department of TDCJ et al
as 1:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Thomas H Clay
Defendant:
State Classification Department of TDCJ, Chief of the SCC Transfer Department, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Dept. of Treasury et al
as 3:2021cv01721
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Clay
Defendant:
Dept. of Treasury, Mnuchin and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Clay v. Hanson et al
as 9:2020cv00019
Defendant:
Dr. Unknown Rivers, Bryan Edlier, Georgia Nehotebah and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas H Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clay v. UTMBH CMC et al
as 4:2018cv03233
Defendant:
UTMBH CMC Estelle Unit Medical Employees, Lannette Linihicum, Earnestine B Julye and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas H Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Clay v. Corrtl Mge Hlth Care Empl, et al
as 18-20192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS H. CLAY
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MANAGED HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES, JESSIE J. HORN, TRS - Millennial Medical Service, LANETTE LINITHICUM, Correctional Managed Care - Texas Department of Criminal Justice Medical Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
