Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Robinson v. Dart et al
as 1:2026cv10813
Plaintiff:
Ramona Robinson
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos et al v. Cook County State Attorney Office et al
as 1:2026cv10561
Plaintiff:
Marcus Ramos and Lametra Phillips
Defendant:
Cook County State Attorney Office, Umbrella Eileen O'Neill Burke, Thomas J. Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Donte Henderson v. Cook County, Illinois, et al
as 26-2800
Plaintiff:
DONTE HENDERSON
Defendant:
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THOMAS J. DART, UNKNOWN SHERIFF DOCTORS and others
Hughes v. Hardimon et al
as 1:2026cv10443
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Hughes, III
Defendant:
D. Hardimon, Cook County, Cook County Jail and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramone Kellum v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 26-2771
Plaintiff:
RAMONE KELLUM, as Special Administrator for Raymond Kellum
Defendant:
THOMAS J. DART and COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Frederick Dean v. C. Smith, et al
as 26-2764
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK DEAN, also known as FREDERICK WILLIAM MAGIC DEAN
Defendant:
C. SMITH, Investigator, JOHN DOE, Investigator and THOMAS J. DART
Frederick Dean v. Investigator Szul, et al
as 26-2763
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK DEAN, also known as FREDERICK WILLIAM MAGIC DEAN
Defendant:
INVESTIGATOR SZUL, Gang Intelligence and THOMAS J. DART
Frederick Dean v. Tom Dart, et al
as 26-2762
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK DEAN, also known as FREDERICK WILLIAM MAGIC DEAN
Defendant:
THOMAS J. DART, SUPERINTENDENT, Div. 7 and ADMINISTRATORS, AND ALL SUPERIOR STAFF
Stefannie Dyson v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 26-2700
Plaintiff:
STEFANNIE DYSON
Defendant:
THOMAS J. DART, KRYSTAL SANKEY, Librarian and T. PATTERSON-DEAN, Supervisor
Smith v. Soto et al
as 1:2026cv09916
Plaintiff:
Brandon Smith
Defendant:
Soto, Cortez, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
