Cases 11 - 20 of 84
Kauffman et al v. Flooring
as 1:2017cv01950
Plaintiff:
Lester W. Kauffman, III and Thomas Smith
Defendant:
Aria Flooring
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
SMITH v. COLVIN
as 2:2017cv01482
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
CAROLYN A. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith et al v. Meeks et al
as 1:2017cv00012
Plaintiff:
Thomas Smith and Carmen Esgro
Defendant:
Laken Meeks, Kenneth Walter Keller and Robert P. Keller
Cross_claimant:
Kenneth Walter Keller and Robert P. Keller
Cross_defendant:
Laken Meeks
Counterclaim_plaintiff:
Kenneth Walter Keller and Robert P. Keller
Counterclaim_defendant:
Carmen Esgro and Thomas Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SMITH v. PITTSBURGH GUITARS OWNER
as 2:2016cv01736
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH GUITARS OWNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CHIEF POASTMASTER GENERAL
as 2:2016cv01737
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
CHIEF POASTMASTER GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. UMPC MERCY HOASPITALS USA CHIFE DIRECTOR AN ASSIST DIRECTORRRRR
as 2:2016cv01738
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
UMPC MERCY HOASPITALS USA CHIFE DIRECTOR AN ASSIST DIRECTORRRRR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WHIRL PUBLICATIONS et al
as 2:2016cv01656
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
WHIRL PUBLICATIONS, DIRECTOR OF SALES MARY ANN TRBOVICH and EDITOR OF MANIGER MR. OR MS. BRUNDY DUNPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SMITH v. UNITED STATES POASTMASTER GENERAL
as 2:2016cv01657
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POASTMASTER GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. MELLOW et al
as 2:2016cv01638
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
MAMMIE MELLOW and MELLON BAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. MERCY BEHAIVOR HEALTH et al
as 2:2016cv01633
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
MERCY BEHAIVOR HEALTH and JEAN CONNORS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
