Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Robert Foster v. Tim Riley
as 16-6654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE FOSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM RILEY, Warden, G. LANE, Assistant Warden Operations, SERGEANT MCMORRIS, Property Control and others
Brian Keith Nesbitt v. Tim Riley
as 15-6835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH NESBITT
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM RILEY, Warden, BRYAN P. STIRLING, Directory of the Department of Corrections, AMY SPENCER and others
Frederick Harris v. Tim Riley
as 15-6317
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDERICK JERMAINE HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
TIM RILEY, Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution
Steven Rollinson v. Tim Riley
as 14-6399
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN A. ROLLINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
TIM RILEY, Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution
Brian Nesbitt v. SC Department of Correction
as 14-6114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH NESBITT
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TYGER RIVER CI, TIM RILEY, Warden Tyger River Correctional and others
Jimmy Jones v. Gary Lane
as 13-7243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY D. JONES, a/k/a Jimmy D. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY LANE, CPL. BETTY RODGERS, LT. LAWRENCE LEVIGNE and others
Defendant:
TIM RILEY, Warden, TYGER RIVER CI, et al., LAURA CALDWELL and others
Gustavo Alvarado v. Tim Riley
as 09-8209
Petitioner - Appellant:
GUSTAVO ALVARADO
Respondent - Appellee:
TIM RILEY, Warden
Titus Geer v. Tim Riley
as 09-8142
Petitioner - Appellant:
TITUS C. GEER, a/k/a Titus Geer
Respondent - Appellee:
TIM RILEY, Warden
Christopher Jones v. SC Dept of Corrections
as 09-7309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
SC DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, JON OZMINT, SC DEPT PROBATION PAROLE AND PARDON SERVICES and others
Randy Drummond v. State of South Carolina
as 08-8068
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDY DRUMMOND
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and TIM RILEY, Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
