Cases 1 - 10 of 31
AUSTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv19515
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY AUSTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
AUSTIN v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE INC. et al
as 3:2023cv10008
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY AUSTIN
Defendant:
Ajanta Pharma USA Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC, Apotex Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Austin v. United States Middle District of Florida
as 3:2020cv01163
Plaintiff:
Timothy Austin
Defendant:
United States Middle District of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv32933
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY AUSTIN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Austin v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00381
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Timothy Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Timothy Piller v. Andrew Saul
as 19-16515
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY AUSTIN PILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Austin v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00815
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner:
Timothy Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. Bonded Logic Incorporated
as 2:2018cv03637
Plaintiff:
Timothy Austin
Defendant:
Bonded Logic Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Austin v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 3:2018cv01147
Plaintiff:
Timothy Austin
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. Florida State Prison
as 3:2018cv00983
Plaintiff:
Timothy Austin
Defendant:
Florida State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
