Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Henson v. Carter et al
as 3:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Timothy G Henson
Defendant:
Robert E Carter, Ron Neal, Christine Vorrier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henson v. Warden
as 3:2020cv00983
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Timothy G Henson
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henson v. Neal et al
as 3:2019cv00396
Defendant:
Erin Jones, Marion Thatcher, Mark Newkirk and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy G Henson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henson v. Carter et al
as 3:2018cv00474
Plaintiff:
Timothy G Henson
Defendant:
Ron Carter, Ron Neal and George Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henson v. Carter et al
as 3:2018cv00475
Plaintiff:
Timothy G Henson
Defendant:
Ron Carter, Ron Neal and George Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henson v. Carter et al
as 3:2017cv00412
Plaintiff:
Timothy G Henson
Defendant:
Robert Carter and Ron Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Henson v. Michael Rains, et al
as 15-1343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY G. HENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL RAINS, in both his official and individual capacities as the Chief Internal Affairs Investigating Officer at the Pendleton Correctional Facility, ROBERT BEAUTRY, Captain, in both his official and individual capacities as the Shift Supervisor at the Pendleton Correctional Facility, JEREMY RUTTAN, Lieutenant, in both his official and individual capacities as a Correctional Officer at the Pendleton Correctional Facility and others
HENSON v. COMMISSIONER et al
as 1:2013cv01020
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, CURTIS BYNUM, COMMISSIONER and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY G. HENSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENSON v. BUSS et al
as 1:2010cv01009
Defendant:
RONDLE ANDERSON, CAPTAIN ROBERT BEAUTRY, JACK BINION and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY G. HENSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
